The publication needs a few things before it can review on a regular basis: a way to write, a way to file pieces by subject, a page that can hold a real review, and a public archive that does not pretend to be older than it is.
That is what this version of the site is. Articles are files in the project, written in Markdown, with a title, a date, a section, and tags. They are built into ordinary pages. There is no content-management system in front of them. A later workflow can add a piece by adding a file and publishing a new build. An internal tool may eventually draft those files. Reading the site does not depend on that tool.
The review page can already hold the parts a review tends to need: headings, figures, captions, tables, quotations, a list of pros and cons, and a place for a score. Those parts are demonstrated in a sample article. They will be used for a product only when a product has actually been reviewed.
Sections for games, technology, hardware, software, and entertainment are already on the site. Most of them are empty. An empty section means no piece has been filed there. It does not mean a review is in progress, and it does not mean one was removed.
Related articles, an RSS feed, and a search page are part of the same foundation. Search looks only at what has been published. It will not invent matches, and it will not search a catalog of products.
The byline on these opening notes is the desk, TDT Reviews. A person’s name will appear when a person has written the piece. Until then, inventing a staff would be a worse kind of placeholder than an empty section.